Weekly News 5



Social media companies must respond to the sinister reality behind fake news 

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/sep/30/social-media-companies-fake-news-us-election

Image result for fake news

Key Data/ Statistical Info
  • Social media companies such as Facebook and Twitter have begun to share evidence of how their platforms are used and abused during elections.
  • Computational propaganda flourished during the 2016 US presidential election. 
  • US voters shared large volumes of polarising political news and information in the form of links to content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources. 
  • First, we found that nationally, Twitter users got more misinformation, polarising and conspiratorial content than professionally produced news.
The article talks about the way in which some users shared political news and information in the form of ''junk news sources'', most of which contained extremist/ sensationalist ideologies.  The article also mentins that due to this ''significant volume of misinformation'' on various social media sites, and in particular Twitter, voters in the US may not be well informed, in order to make good decisions. Furthermore, the article goes on to say that this may lead to fake news being produced in other areas of news such as 'science''- with the misinformation of climate change, smoking and cancer, being distributed online. 

This links to NDM as its shows how UGC and the freedom of speech on social media sites, paves the way for some users to produce their own news, which could be used as propaganda( for extremist/ sensationalist values). The increasingly large amount of fake news online, is one factor that is ruining the ability for users to participate in political discussion. In the new age of digital media, who's to say that anything posted on the interent is entirely true/ accurate. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

January assessment: Learner response

NDM Essay

NDM Baseline assessment: Learner response